Q1: Do you know your company’s plan to transition from ArcGIS Desktop (ArcMap) to ArcGIS Pro?

Already running Pro side-by-side with ArcGIS Desktop
Fully to Pro in 2021
Partly to Pro in 2021, side-by-side with ArcGIS Desktop
2022 or beyond

Q2: Have you tried using the OOSA data in GOMsmart?

Company does not have OOSA historical database
Have access but have not tried it
Have used it to view OOSA data

Q3: In the Depth vs. Mud Weight reports of the Drilling Analytics, we questioned the proper way of displaying Mud Weights and Shoe Tests going down a borehole, with or without lines connecting the values. Which of these is preferential in terms of accuracy and aesthetics, and why? If you have other ideas about the display, please include them here.

Q4: Given the geology & geophysical log (top) and mudlog (bottom) above, are there other curves that should be added? Should any curves by omitted?

Q5: For the two logs above, are there other datasets that should be used for the context tract at the far right (instead of Paleo, Hydrocarbon Bearing Zones, Geomarkers and Completions)?

Q6: If you would like to schedule a free demo of GOM³, GOMsmart or the GOM³ Analytics Add-on, please enter your email below and we will contact you to set that up for your group: